Enhancing Quality Control in Automotive Reconditioning: A Case Study of Carsome Certified Lab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58915/aset.v4i1.1597Abstract
This study examines quality control (QC) practices at Carsome Certified Lab (CCL), focusing on the reconditioning of pre-owned vehicles. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates analysis of internal QC records, interviews with CCL staff, and customer satisfaction surveys. Findings highlight significant inconsistencies, especially in aesthetic evaluations, with about 30% of vehicles requiring rework due to initially missed defects. Customer surveys indicate a high overall satisfaction rate (75%), yet 20% report dissatisfaction linked primarily to aesthetic issues. Statistical analysis reveals a strong correlation (p < 0.05) between the thoroughness of QC checks and customer satisfaction levels. The study advocates for more rigorous, standardized QC protocols and the adoption of advanced technologies (digital tools, artificial intelligence, imaging technologies, etc.) to improve evaluation precision and consistency. These enhancements are projected to boost customer satisfaction and operational efficiency, serving as a model for similar reconditioning facilities and contributing to industry-wide standards improvement.
Keywords:
Quality Control, Automotive Reconditioning, Industry Standards, Case Study, Carsome, Process ImprovementReferences
Ishikawa, K., & Loftus, J. H. Introduction to quality control. Tokyo: 3A Corporation, vol 98, (1990) p. 31.
Mitra, A. Fundamentals of quality control and improvement. John Wiley & Sons, (2016).
Msakni, M. K., Risan, A., & Schütz, P. Using machine learning prediction models for quality control: a case study from the automotive industry. Computational Management Science, vol 20, issue 1 (2023) p.14.
Mould, D., & Rosin, P. L. A benchmark image set for evaluating stylization. In Expressive (2016) pp. 11-20.
Zhang, J., Miao, Y., & Yu, J. A comprehensive survey on computational aesthetic evaluation of visual art images: Metrics and challenges. IEEE Access, vol 9, (2021) pp. 77164-77187.
Kimball, D. A. (Ed.). Citrus processing: quality control and technology. Springer Science & Business Media. (2012).
Wang, P., Tao, H., Qi, J., & Li, P. Machining quality prediction of complex thin-walled parts using multi-task dual domain adaptive deep transfer learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol 62, (2024) p. 102640.
Mahmood, S., M. Ahmed, S., Panthi, K., & Ishaque Kureshi, N. Determining the cost of poor quality and its impact on productivity and profitability. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol 4, issue 3 (2014) pp. 296-311.
Anthony, K. A., Damaro, A. O., & Ngozi, M. O. G. B. O. L. U. Sustaining Organizational Profitability Through Enhanced Quality Control Practices In Manufacturing Businesses. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, vol 5, issue 6 (2023) pp. 373-385.
Ghelani, H. AI-Driven Quality Control in PCB Manufacturing: Enhancing Production Efficiency and Precision. Valley International Journal Digital Library, (2024) pp. 1549-1564.
