Crystal properties analysis using the Cramer-Cohen method and the MAUD software in SrTiO3 ceramic doped with ruthenium oxide (RuO2)

Authors

  • Irzaman Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • F. Mufarrohah Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • P. Handayani Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • M. A Santi Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • V. Rahmawaty aDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • N. F. Har Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • A. A. Setiawan Computer Engineering Study Program, College of Vocational Studies, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16128, Indonesia
  • R. Siskandar Computer Engineering Study Program, College of Vocational Studies, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16128, Indonesia
  • H. Syafutra Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • E. Pratama PT. Global Pratama Powerindo, Jalan Soekarno-Hatta Graha Panyileukan Asri no.8, Bandung, West Java, 40614, Indonesia
  • R. P. Jenie Binawan University Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, Jakarta, 13630, Indonesia
  • Tony Sumaryada Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, West Java, 16680, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58915/ijneam.v18i4.2665

Keywords:

Crystal properties analysis, Cramer-Cohen method, MAUD software, SrTiO3, Ceramic

Abstract

The analysis of Strontium Titanate (SrTiO3) ceramics doped with Ruthenium (Ru) with variations of dopant concentration at 0%, 0.5%, and 1% using the Solid-State Reaction method was successfully executed. The annealing process started at room temperature and was raised to an annealing temperature of 850°C at a heating rate of 1.67°C/minute, held constant for 8 hours, and then cooled down to room temperature for approximately 13 hours. XRD data analysis using the Cramer-Cohen method showed lattice parameters of
a = b = c = 3.905 Å for undoped SrTiO3, a = b = c = 3.903 Å for SrTiO3 doped with 0.5% Ruthenium, and a = b = c = 3.901 Å for SrTiO3 doped with 1% Ruthenium, with a cubic crystal structure. XRD data analysis using the MAUD software employing the Rietveld method with 21 iterations resulted in the diffraction pattern of SrTiO3 ceramics, yielding lattice parameters of a = b = c = 3.907 Å for undoped SrTiO3, a = b = c = 3.906 Å for SrTiO3 doped with 0.5% Ruthenium, and a = b = c = 3.905 Å for SrTiO3 doped with 1% Ruthenium, with a cubic crystal too. The XRD data analysis using both the Cramer-Cohen method and the MAUD software employing the Rietveld method showed relatively close lattice parameters, indicating that the experimental XRD spectra closely align with the theoretical analysis performed by the MAUD software.

Downloads

Published

04-11-2025

How to Cite

[1]
Irzaman, “Crystal properties analysis using the Cramer-Cohen method and the MAUD software in SrTiO3 ceramic doped with ruthenium oxide (RuO2)”, IJNeaM, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 619–623, Nov. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles