The Effects of Pretreatment with Different Concentrations of Sodium Hydroxide on Paddy Straw for Biogas Production

Tengku Roslina Tuan Yusof; Thinesh Raj A/L N Gopal

doi:10.58915/aset.v5i2.3524

Authors

Tengku Roslina Tuan Yusof Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Thinesh Raj A/L N Gopal Universiti Malaysia Perlis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58915/aset.v5i2.3524

Keywords:

Biogas, Pretreatment, Paddy straw, Sodium hydroxide

Abstract

Paddy straw is an abundant agricultural residue with high potential for renewable energy generation through anaerobic digestion; however, its lignocellulosic structure limits biodegradability and biogas yield. This study evaluates the effect of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pretreatment on biogas production from fresh and dried paddy straw at concentrations ranging from 0% to 10% (w/v). The straw was immersed in NaOH solutions for 24 hours and subsequently digested under mesophilic conditions (35 °C) for 17 days in batch reactors. Biogas production was monitored daily, and cumulative yields were recorded. The results indicate that biogas production is higher in the treated sample than in to untreated sample. The treated sample shows that optimal concentrations are 6% NaOH for fresh paddy straw (65.8 mL cumulative yield) and 8% NaOH for dried paddy straw (52.05 mL). Excessive alkalinity negatively affected microbial activity and reduced performance. These findings demonstrate that optimized NaOH pretreatment improves digestibility and biogas yield, with substrate condition playing a critical role in determining optimal treatment levels, and align with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

References

[1] Shafie, S. M. A review on paddy residue-based power generation: Energy, environment, and economic perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol 59 (2016) pp.1089-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.224

[2] Lim, J. S., Manan, Z. A., Alwi, S. R. W., Hashim, H. A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol 16, issue 5 (2012) pp.3084-3094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.051

[3] Bala, B., Kumar, S. From organic waste to renewable energy: Rice straw. Paddy Straw Waste for Biorefinery Applications, (2024) pp.31-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8224-0_2

[4] Ni, Y., Zhang, M., Qian, X., Shen, G., Mwabonje, O. Anaerobic digestion of rice straw as profitable climate solution reduces paddy field greenhousegas emissions and produces climate-smart fertilizer under carbon trading mechanisms. Sustainability, vol 17, issue 6 (2025) pp.2439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062439

[5] Bing, R. G., Sulis, D. B., Carey, M. J., Manesh, M. J., Ford, K. C., Straub, C. T., Kelly, R. M. Beyond low lignin: Identifying the primary barrier to plant biomass conversion by fermentative bacteria. Science Advances, vol 10, issue 42 (2024) pp.eadq4941. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq4941

[6] Tamilselvan, R., Selwynraj, A. I. Enhancing biogas generation from lignocellulosic biomass through biological pretreatment: Exploring the role of ruminant microbes and anaerobic fungi. Anaerobe, vol 85 (2024) pp.102815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102815

[7] Sun, Z., Liu, Q., Li, Y., Mazarji, M., Feng, L., Pan, J. Deciphering the impact of lignin on anaerobic digestion: Focus on inhibition mechanisms and methods for alleviating inhibition. ACS Omega, vol 9, issue 44 (2024) pp.44033-44041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c06023

[8] Shah, T. A., Chuancheng, D., Li, Z., Zhang, A., Dabiellil, M., Jardan, Y. A. B. Polysaccharides and lignin extraction of sugarcane leaves for enhancing anaerobic digestion. Journal of Natural Fibers, vol 22, issue 1 (2025) pp.2533347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2533347

[9] Hmeekong, A., Chuenchom, L., Charnnok, B., Chaiprapat, S. Sustainable valorization of grass biomass via hydrothermal pretreatment for biogas and biofuel co-production. Journal of Environmental Management, vol 389 (2025) pp.126109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126109

[10] Meegoda, J. N., Li, B., Patel, K., Wang, L. B. A review of the processes, parameters, and optimization of anaerobic digestion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol 15, issue 10 (2018) pp.2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102224

[11] Ying, W., Shi, Z., Yang, H., Xu, G., Zheng, Z., Yang, J. Effect of alkaline lignin modification on cellulase-lignin interactions and enzymatic saccharification yield. Biotechnology for Biofuels, vol 11, issue 1 (2018) pp.214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1217-6

[12] Msimbira, L. A., Smith, D. L. The roles of plant growth promoting microbes in enhancing plant tolerance to acidity and alkalinity stresses. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, vol 4 (2020) pp.106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00106

[13] Zhou, Z., Meng, Q., Yu, Z. Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol 77, issue 8 (2011) pp.2634-2639. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02779-10

[14] Rismani-Yazdi, H., Carver, S. M., Christy, A. D., Yu, Z., Bibby, K., Peccia, J., Tuovinen, O. H. Suppression of methanogenesis in cellulose-fed microbial fuel cells in relation to performance, metabolite formation, and microbial population. Bioresource Technology, vol 129 (2013) pp.281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.064

[15] Ahring, B. K., Murali, N., Srinivas, K. Fermentation of cellulose with a mixed microbial rumen culture with and without methanogenesis. Fermentation Technology, vol 7 (2018) pp.152. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7972.1000152

[16] Joy, J., Jose, C., Mathew, P. L., Thomas, S., Khalaf, M. N. Biological delignification of biomass. Green Polymers and Environmental Pollution Control, (2015) pp.271.

[17] Beccari, M., Bonemazzi, F., Majone, M., Riccardi, C. Interaction between acidogenesis and methanogenesis in the anaerobic treatment of olive oil mill effluents. Water Research, vol 30, issue 1 (1996) pp.183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00150-6

[18] Lai, S. M., Chen, Y. Y., Liu, C. P., Hsieh, C. K., Lin, J. Y. Degradation of inhibitor in alkaline cleaning solution for post-Cu CMP cleaning. Surface and Coatings Technology, vol 350 (2018) pp.1080-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.079

[19] Machhirake, N., Singh, D., Yadav, B. R., Tembhare, M., Kumar, S. Optimizing alkali-pretreatment dosage for waste-activated sludge disintegration and enhanced biogas production yield. Environmental Research, vol 252 (2024) pp.118876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118876

[20] Naik, G. P., Poonia, A. K., Chaudhari, P. K. Maximization of biogas by minimal microwave and alkaline pretreatment of rice straw. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, vol 14, issue 13 (2024) pp.14365-14378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03482-1